News

With Justice Breyer Gone, Americans Get a Radical New Supreme Court Justice

by Mia Gradick • 5 min read

Kentanji Brown Jackson was recently sworn in and now replaces Justice Stephen Breyer, who stepped down from the bench after nearly three decades. As she takes a seat, many Americans are wondering, what will it mean for religious liberty in America?

What Does Justice Jackson’s Confirmation Mean for Religious Liberty?

Justice Jackson will not drastically change the balance of the Supreme Court. The Court is still comprised of three liberal and six conservative justices.

However, it does change the nature of the liberal wing of the Court.

First Liberty’s President and CEO Kelly Shackelford explains that Justice Jackson’s confirmation “is not merely substituting one liberal jurist for another. It is an aggressive move to push the Supreme Court hard in the direction of the political left.”

First Liberty thoroughly reviewed her record and our analysis revealed multiple red flags suggesting she could be hostile to religious liberty and continue a career of liberal activism on the bench. In Justice Jackson, Americans are getting a radical jurist, someone whose ideology is far outside the mainstream.

Justice Jackson was one of the most frequently reversed judges on the D.C. federal district court. That’s a sure sign of her judicial activism—intervening where she should not—and getting the law wrong on constitutional matters.

Jackson has been endorsed by virtually every liberal activist group in America, receiving praise from Planned Parenthood, Center for Reproductive Rights, American Civil Liberties Union, American Atheists, Human Rights Campaign, Demand Justice, and other radical organizations.

This is especially concerning because she is replacing Justice Breyer, a liberal justice who often would join his conservative colleagues on cases involving faith. Deseret News reported:

“Although the Republican-appointed members of the court are frequently portrayed as pro-religious liberty in the media, Breyer also frequently voted in favor of religious liberty during his tenure. In 9 of 13 religious liberty cases since 2006, Breyer joined the majority to rule in favor of religious rights. One study has categorized him in the top half of the most pro-religion justices to serve on the court since 1953.”

Some notable examples of Breyer affirming religious liberty include:

• Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission (2018). In this 7-2 ruling, the Court held that the government was hostile toward a Christian cake artist and that it must respect and show tolerance for people of faith and their religious beliefs.
• American Legion v. American Humanist Association (2019), First Liberty’s landmark victory for the Bladensburg Peace Cross. In a 7-2 decision, the Court declared the cross-shaped constitutional and set a new precedent protecting similar religious displays nationwide.
• Our Lady of Guadalupe v. Morrissey-Berru (2020). In a 7-2 decision, the Court held that government cannot control a church school’s decision about who teaches its religion classes.
• Fulton v. Philadelphia (2021). The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that the state cannot discriminate against faith-based social services providers.

To be clear, Justice Breyer is not a conservative or an originalist who unwaveringly interprets the law and the Constitution according to its original text. He is a liberal justice. But his judicial philosophy led him to join many of the Court’s opinions protecting religious liberty.

With Justice Jackson on the Supreme Court, that’s most likely about to change.

Although Justice Jackson conceded religious liberty is a “fundamental right,” the record is not promising. There are still many warning signs that she will not protect that right, including her repeated refusals to specify her judicial philosophy or what she believes the free exercise of religion means.

A justice’s philosophy and interpretation of the law could be the difference between a victory that upholds religious freedom and our constitutional rights—or a loss that strips away our liberties. We hope that as a Supreme Court Justice, Jackson will reject the urge to legislate from the bench and instead choose to faithfully defend our freedoms and interpret the Constitution according to its original meaning.